Court Stays Hearing Of Grab S Challenge Against Rm86 77m Proposed Fine


 


The Federal Court ordered a stay on the scheduled High Court hearing next Monday next week concerning Grab’s legal challenge against a proposed RM86.77 million fine over alleged contravention of competition laws.
The three-person bench chaired by Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusuf today allowed the stay application by the appellant, namely the Malaysian Competition Commission (MyCC).
The commission sought the stay on Monday’s hearing pending disposal of its application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court against an earlier Court of Appeal ruling that granted leave to Grab to proceed with the legal challenge.
On April 19 last year, the Court of Appeal granted leave to Grab to commence with the judicial review.
The Kuala Lumpur High Court - which initially rejected Grab’s application for leave to institute judicial review on March 9, 2020 - has then set to hear the merits of the e-hailer’s legal challenge on Monday next week, due to the Court of Appeal allowing the company’s appeal for leave.
MyCC was seeking the full Court of Appeal grounds as part of its appeal now pending before the Federal Court.
During online Federal Court proceedings conducted via zoom this morning, MyCC’s counsel Gopal Sri Ram sought the stay on the lower court Monday hearing, as the regulator had yet to be provided with the full written grounds of the Court of Appeal ruling that granted the judicial review leave.
“We need to see how the Court of Appeal grounds (of judgment) dealt with the issue,” the lawyer said, adding that the regulator would be put in a difficult position if the Monday High Court hearing commences while the appeal before the Federal Court is yet to conclude.
Grab’s counsel Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, however, objected to the stay application. He contended that the High Court already denied MyCC’s application to stay hearing of the merits of the judicial review, pending disposal of the regulator’s appeal now at the Federal Court.
At the end of brief submissions today, Rohana ruled that the Federal Court allowed the stay on the Monday hearing, pending the full Court of Appeal grounds being made available to MyCC.
“After hearing submissions from parties, we adjourned the matter (before the Federal Court), pending the Court of Appeal grounds of judgment being made available (to MyCC).
“We order the interim stay of the judicial review (hearing before the High Court), pending disposal of the (MyCC’s) leave application (to appeal to the Federal Court),” she said.
The other members of today’s bench were Federal Court judges Abdul Rahman Sebli and Mary Lim Thiam Suan.
Abusing dominant position
On Dec 30, 2019, Grab Inc, as well as related corporate entities Grabcar Sdn Bhd and Myteksi Sdn Bhd, filed the judicial review bid against the MyCC.
On Oct 3, earlier the same year, it was reported that MyCC proposed a fine of more than RM86 million against Grab for allegedly violating the Competition Act 2010 through its purported imposing of restrictive clauses on its drivers.
The ride-hailing firm seeks, among others, a declaration that the regulator is not empowered to publicise or communicate the proposed decision via the publication of a news release titled “MyCC proposes to fine Grab RM86 million for abusive practices” at its website as well as during a press conference on Oct 3, 2019.
Grab contended, among others, that in the course of MyCC’s investigation, which began on Dec 3, 2018, the regulator did not specify the basis of its belief on how Grabcar and Myteksi, which are collectively also known as Grab Malaysia, had contravened Section 10 (1) of the Competition Act.
Section 10 (1) states that an enterprise is prohibited from engaging, whether independently or collectively, in any conduct which amounts to an abuse of a dominant position in any market for goods or services.
Grab also alleged that the regulator had not abided by the Competition Act by giving the ride-hailing firm adequate notice that it was under investigation and to inform the company about the nature of the alleged infringement to afford the firm a meaningful opportunity to be heard during the probe. - Mkini


Artikel ini hanyalah simpanan cache dari url asal penulis yang berkebarangkalian sudah terlalu lama atau sudah dibuang :

http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.com/2022/02/court-stays-hearing-of-grabs-challenge.html

Kempen Promosi dan Iklan
Kami memerlukan jasa baik anda untuk menyokong kempen pengiklanan dalam website kami. Serba sedikit anda telah membantu kami untuk mengekalkan servis percuma aggregating ini kepada semua.

Anda juga boleh memberikan sumbangan anda kepada kami dengan menghubungi kami di sini
Court Denies Serba Dinamik S Injunction Against Bursa

Court Denies Serba Dinamik S Injunction Against Bursa

papar berkaitan - pada 11/2/2022 - jumlah : 211 hits
Serba Dinamik Holdings Bhd filed its originating summons and injunction application in November 2021 naming Bursa Malaysia Bhd and Ernst Young Consulting Sdn Bhd as the defendants KUALA LUMPUR The High Court today rejected Serba Dinamik Hol...
Court Cluster The Only Political Weapon Against Umno For Some Says Zahid

Court Cluster The Only Political Weapon Against Umno For Some Says Zahid

papar berkaitan - pada 28/1/2022 - jumlah : 371 hits
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said that as Umno president he has a responsibility to restore the Barisan Nasional government PETALING JAYA Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has hit back at those who claim that the court cluster of Umno leaders are try...
Mum To Pursue Challenge On Conversion Despite Court Verdict Says Lawyer

Mum To Pursue Challenge On Conversion Despite Court Verdict Says Lawyer

papar berkaitan - pada 1/2/2022 - jumlah : 178 hits
A leave application by a Buddhist mother who converted to Islam will be heard on April 12 PUTRAJAYA A Buddhist mother who embraced Islam but failed to convert her two children will pursue her case in the Federal Court despite the Selangor I...
Police Report Lodged Against Activist Lalitha For Lying To The Court

Police Report Lodged Against Activist Lalitha For Lying To The Court

papar berkaitan - pada 10/2/2022 - jumlah : 287 hits
A police report has been lodged against Lalitha Kunaratnam the activist who had exposed a top graft buster and his shareholdings for allegedly lying to the court According to a source close to the matter Lalitha had allegedly made a false c...
Welfare Dept To Care For Single Mum S 3 Children Till Court Hearing

Welfare Dept To Care For Single Mum S 3 Children Till Court Hearing

papar berkaitan - pada 15/2/2022 - jumlah : 269 hits
The three children will now be staying at Rumah Taman Sinar Harapan a welfare department facility in Jitra Kedah GEORGE TOWN The children of a divorcee who were allegedly under the care of religious authorities in Perlis have been placed wi...
Madpet Calls For Contempt Of Court Against Home Minister Igp

Madpet Calls For Contempt Of Court Against Home Minister Igp

papar berkaitan - pada 4/2/2022 - jumlah : 233 hits
The Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture has called for contempt of court against those responsible for obstructing inquests in custodial death cases from being completed within the required time frame In the group s statement today...
March 22 Hearing Of Src S Asset Freezing Bid Against Najib

March 22 Hearing Of Src S Asset Freezing Bid Against Najib

papar berkaitan - pada 15/2/2022 - jumlah : 283 hits
The SRC International Sdn Bhd s application for a Mareva injunction against Najib Abdul Razak s assets linked to its RM42 million civil suit against the former premier would come up for a court hearing on March 22 The legal teams for both t...
Kj Orders Fine Against Defence Minister Johor Mb Mic President

Kj Orders Fine Against Defence Minister Johor Mb Mic President

papar berkaitan - pada 14/2/2022 - jumlah : 200 hits
Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin has ordered his ministry to issue a fine against several top government leaders for allegedly violating Covid 19 standard operating procedures This was after a video emerged showing the leaders wading throu...
Lokman Denies Not Filing Statement Of Defence Against Syariah Judge S Lawsuit

Lokman Denies Not Filing Statement Of Defence Against Syariah Judge S Lawsuit

papar berkaitan - pada 16/2/2022 - jumlah : 211 hits
Former Umno supreme council member Datuk Lokman Noor Adam has denied that he failed to file his statement of defence against a lawsuit filed by the Chief Syariah Court Judge of Malaysia Datuk Setia Dr Mohd Na im Mokhtar NSTP file picKUALA L...
From Data To Decisions How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming Digital Marketing Strategies

Ketua Pengarah Akps Beri Amaran Keras Isu Rasuah Imigresen

Singgah Pasar Malam Sekolah

Little Black Number A Honda Cb350 Caf Racer From Austria

Kemalangan 15 Motosikal Seorang Lagi Meninggal Dunia

Akaun X Kena Hacked Setel Dalam Masa 8 Jam

Tri Suaka Feat Dodhy Kangen Andai Waktu Bisa Kembali Chord

Wanita Cuci Kereta Guna Alat Cuci Cermin Cetus Rasa Marah Netizen


echo '';
Info Dan Sinopsis Drama Berepisod Dendam Seorang Madu Slot Tiara Astro Prima

10 Fakta Biodata Amira Othman Yang Digosip Dengan Fattah Amin Penyanyi Lagu Bila Nak Kahwin

5 Tips Macam Mana Nak Ajak Orang Kita Suka Dating Dengan Kita

Info Dan Sinopsis Drama Berepisod Keluarga Itu Slot Lestary TV3

Bolehkah Manusia Transgender Mencapai Klimaks Selepas Bertukar


Bergema Laungan Takbir Dan Doa Perang Mahu Anwar Turun Untuk Naikkan Hamzah Sebagai Pm Ke

Ali Baba And The Filthy Rich Thieves

Bring Me Your Concerns In Parliament Not Just On Streets Says Anwar

More Than Rm2 Million Raised For Tiger Conservation Since 2021

Kpdn Cadang Benar Bantuan Sara Diguna Di Jualan Rahmah Madani

Final Piala Aff U 23 2025 Indonesia Vs Vietnam Tiket Mulai Rp 200 Ribu