Analysis Of Hate Speech Threat Part 2 Political Exploitation

---

 


 Hate speech is frequently used as a tool for political advantage.
Recently, the Pahang sultan expressed disapproval of certain political figures for their manipulation of the 3R (race, religion and royalty) issues, comparing them to “clowns” who exacerbate division instead of promoting unity.
This form of political opportunism poses a significant risk to national unity, as leaders often prioritise their own interests over the collective welfare of the nation.
To address this challenge, political leaders need to dedicate themselves to promoting unity rather than fostering division.
ADSEstablishing bipartisan agreements to denounce hate speech, along with implementing stricter legal repercussions for politicians who exploit racial and religious tensions, is crucial for maintaining Malaysia’s social harmony.
The Vijayan case
The situation involving Vijayan Savarinathan underscores the perils associated with reactionary hate speech. In response to the Era FM controversy, he posted a video that disparaged Islam and Malay Muslims.
Although his behaviour was widely and strongly condemned, it also resulted in doxxing, where his personal details were disclosed online by various individuals.
This event exemplifies the cycle of hate that can arise from hate speech. Furthermore, it emphasises the necessity for conflict resolution approaches that can mitigate the escalation of inflammatory language.
It is crucial for Malaysians to receive education on digital ethics and the consequences of hate speech to avert similar occurrences in the future.
Nazri’s insights on unity
Former Umno minister and US ambassador Nazri Abdul Aziz articulated significant observations regarding the necessity of acknowledging Malaysia’s multi-ethnic and multi-religious character.
He praised the citizens of Sabah and Sarawak for embodying the essence of unity, emphasising their tendency to place national identity above race or religion.
Ex-minister Nazri Abdul AzizConversely, he expressed concern over many Malays in Peninsular Malaysia who, particularly for political gain, tend to prioritise racial identity over national affiliation.
Nazri’s appeal for a cohesive Malaysia serves as a compelling reminder of the nation’s collective principles.
He noted that renowned athletes such as Nicol David and Lee Chong Wei represented Malaysia on the international stage not as representatives of their ethnic groups, but as Malaysians.
ADSHis remarks confront the rising prominence of political Islam, underscoring the necessity for the nation to uphold its multicultural identity rather than succumb to narrow racial or religious interests.
Given the current socio-political climate, Nazri’s observations are particularly pertinent.
The unity of the nation hinges on the acknowledgement that Malaysia’s diversity constitutes its greatest asset, and that divisive rhetoric, whether from extremist preachers, media figures, or ordinary citizens, must be countered in favour of inclusivity and mutual respect.
National security implications
The increasing prevalence of hate speech in Malaysia represents not merely a societal concern but also a potential threat to national security.

Individuals who propagate hate, media figures disseminating discriminatory rhetoric, and pervasive everyday racism contribute to a climate of mistrust and animosity.
If this trend continues unchecked, it may lead to violence or civil disorder, mirroring situations in other nations where racial and religious tensions have resulted in significant social turmoil.
It is imperative for the government, along with law enforcement and intelligence agencies, to acknowledge the gravity of this situation.
The proliferation of hate speech undermines national solidarity and jeopardises the unity of the nation.
Given Malaysia’s distinctive social structure, characterised by a diverse array of ethnic and religious groups, any factor that diminishes this cohesion poses a risk to the country’s stability.
It is indispensable for political leaders across the spectrum to collaboratively confront this challenge, as it transcends ethnic and religious boundaries.
Failure to act or a passive approach could exacerbate divisions and lead to a fragmented society.
A call for cohesion
To safeguard Malaysia’s identity as a multi-ethnic and multi-religious nation, prompt measures must be taken against those who advocate hate speech.
Political leaders should unite, putting aside partisan divides to denounce hate preachers, media personalities, and individuals who promote intolerance.
There is a pressing need for stricter enforcement of anti-hate speech legislation to ensure that those who incite division through their rhetoric are held accountable under the law.
Moreover, public awareness campaigns are essential to educate citizens about the detrimental effects of hate speech and racism.
Malaysians should be instilled with an appreciation for diversity and an understanding of the nation’s multicultural heritage.
This educational initiative ought to be incorporated into school curricula and bolstered by government-led campaigns aimed at cultivating a culture of understanding and inclusivity.
Protect unity, denounce hate speech
Hate speech in Malaysia, whether disseminated by religious leaders, media figures, or ordinary citizens, represents a significant danger to national unity.
The exploitation of 3R issues has surfaced as a contemporary mechanism for societal disruption, as highlighted by both law enforcement and political authorities.
Tackling this issue necessitates a comprehensive strategy that includes enhanced legal measures, responsible political governance, media responsibility, and public awareness initiatives.
The true strength of Malaysia resides in its diversity. To protect this unity, it is imperative for the nation to collectively denounce hate speech and foster an environment of mutual respect.
Only through inclusivity, accountability, and a dedication to common values can Malaysia continue to prosper as a cohesive multi-ethnic and multi-religious community.
The increasing prominence of hate preachers, along with incidents such as the Era FM controversy, the racist corn seller episode, and Vijayan’s reactionary hate speech, illustrates the dangers that hate speech poses in a society as varied as Malaysia’s.
Such discourse jeopardises not only social harmony but also national security. Nazri’s appeal for a united Malaysia serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of embracing the nation’s diversity.
To secure the future of the country, Malaysia must reject divisiveness and collaboratively strive to uphold its multicultural identity.
Only through unity, accountability, and mutual respect can Malaysia ensure the continued flourishing of its multi-ethnic and multi-religious society. - Mkini
R PANEIR SELVAM is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geo-political matters.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.

---