Who Ll Win The Rafizi Vs Farhash Battle Royale Is Pmx Able To Help His Ex Aide Once The Beans Are Spilled In Court

---

DOUBTLESSLY, a battle royale is brewing between two PKR insiders after former economy minister Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli refused to budge after he was served with a cease-and-desist demand by former political secretary to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim-turned-corporate high-flyer Datuk Farhash Wafa Salvador Rizal Mubarak.
Not only is he unfazed by the syringe attack on his only 12-year-old son, the former PKR deputy president has openly expressed his preparedness to meet Farhash in court for all his statements about the latter are based on facts
Or neither would Rafizi apologise or retract his Aug 20 video involving Farhash whereby he confirmed that a week before his son’s assault, he had met with a whistleblower regarding a scandal that he was investigating of which the information centred on Farhash and the dealings of his companies.
“Oh, Oh … Strongly advise Farhash not to sue Rafizi (RR) … RR can spill everything in court then,” advised vocal human rights activist and lawyer Siti Kasim.
“As RR said, he talks about facts. You can’t sue if people talk about facts that are true. Berani ke si Farhash (would Farhash dare) for all the details (are) coming out in court?
Advantage Rafizi
Political satirist tokcin (@tokcin70) reckoned that Farhash is playing with fire if he thinks that his letter of demand can shut the Pandan MP’s mouth.
“You’re wrong. The court is not a trap for Rafizi – it’s a stage. Every document becomes evidence, every question becomes a revelation,” he reacted to Farhash’s cease-and-desist letter for Rafizi.

“This case is no longer a legal matter. It’s a battle of optics. If Farhash continues, the Pandora’s box is opened. If he withdraws, he’s confirmed taking the bait. In both ways, Rafizi has won in the arena of perception.”
As opposition-inclined lawyer Siditious (@Solisidto) put it, “Farhash will only expose himself to cross-examination in the witness box by Rafizi’s lawyer” if he proceeds with his lawsuit against Rafizi.
“This cross-examination can’t be dodged. Every question must be answered, no avoidance whatsoever. If the answers are shaky and unconvincing, it can affect someone’s case in court,” cautioned the political observer.

“That’s why in Saiful Bukhari’s case back then, Anwar (referring to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s previous sodomy case) only gave an unsworn statement. Because he didn’t want to face cross-examination.”
Lastly, Gerakan cybertrooper hailed Rafizi and UMNO renegade Isham Jalil as “two outstanding and daring political figures who could down Farhash & PMX” despite facing legal actions by Farhash.



“Rafizi & Isham are causing fear in PMX who could be in trouble if his blue-eyed boy Farhash exposes him,” argued Jess.
“But as you know, the MACC (Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission) chief & the AG (Attorney-General) are recommended by PMX to the king for approval while the new chief justice is being closely linked to UMNO. Monitor closely both legal battles.
“Two-and-a-half weeks ago, there was a Farhash vs Isham court hearing but Farhash didn’t dare to appear in court to meet Isham face to face. Why?” –  Focus Malaysia

---