Tall Tales That Were Told To Cover Up 1mdb Scandal

---

 



Judges make their decisions on the facts before them – nothing else.
No one can influence them and attempts to do so have been summarily dismissed most of the time.
Accusations will be made and attempts will continue to be made by some parties with vested interests to insinuate that judges were biased, especially if the verdict does not go the way they wanted.
This writer will always err on the side of caution and will be especially careful rather than taking a risk or making a mistake and inviting summonses for contemptuous conduct because I am addressing an issue on a case which has been decided and others which are in progress.
I have no interest in influencing the judges but am more interested in informing the masses of the many issues which have surfaced since trials started on financial misconduct on the part of former leaders.
Stored in the archives, there are scores of documents in the form of news reports, commentaries and official reports which weaved a tapestry of lies on the 1MDB scandal.
Some were bare-faced denials, others were unsubstantiated claims and a few invoked the name of the Almighty.
But none could prevent the truth – an avalanche of it when things were unravelled by investigators and adduced as evidence in court.
Arab donor
On Aug 22, 2015 when Ahmad Zahid Hamidi was Umno deputy president, he told the audience - members of the Sri Gading Umno division - he had met the wealthy Arab family who had donated the US$700 million that was channelled into party president Najib Abdul Razak’s personal account.
"When I asked them why they donated US$700 million to Malaysia, they said, 'Malaysia is not the only country we are channelling our money to. There are many more friendly Muslim countries we are donating to.'
"They want Umno and BN to continue ruling the country,"
Former deputy prime minister Ahmad Zahid HamidiThe family, he also reportedly said, was impressed by how Malaysia, with its plural society, still managed to remain moderate without side-lining any other religions.
Zahid said he had also met with the investment officer of the wealthy Arab family, who explained how the first US$100 million was given via a cheque under Najib’s name and the rest through other channels.
“I saw the documents myself… the original documents, not photostated ones, and I also saw the money trail,” he added.
Later, opening the Sekijang Umno division meeting in Segamat, Zahid said as deputy prime minister and home minister, he was privy to all information around the country verified by not one but several intelligence agencies.
“I obtained the information accurately and did not add or minus the facts. The conspiracy to topple the government would take place if not stopped. This is the truth. Not an attempt,” he had said.
The naïve and gullible were mesmerised and swallowed his words him – hook line and sinker.
After all, he was No 2 to the highest seat in the land and why should he tell them a fib?
But when the chips were down when his boss was indicted on a slew of charges, there was no one to support his claim of the Arab donation.
Najib was alone and the chest-thumping Zahid who had earlier “met the donor” was not there when he was needed most.
Instead, he was fighting his own battles in yet another court before another judge.
If indeed he “saw the original documents”, Zahid would have been the principal defence witness in Najib’s court case where the donation theory was blown to smithereens.
It is not intended to say that Zahid and others had the propensity not to tell the truth but to show how the tall tales were spun to make support that incredulous theory of an Arab donation.
Apandi’s defamation suit
Even the former attorney-general and the former head of the MACC had used the same script – the money came from an Arab donor. 
In the defamation case of Mohamed Apandi Ali v Lim Kit Siang, the donation theory was again demolished and the former endeared admonishment from the court.
Former attorney-general Mohamed Apandi AliJustice Azimah Omar said Apandi’s “actions and inactions (during his tenure as AG) indubitably give rise to “a plethora of harrowing suspicions and questions” which did not “appear out of thin air” but arose from Apandi’s “actions and inactions, directly or indirectly” which “may be seen to have assisted in the cover-up of the 1MDB scandal” and “the personalities involved”. 
Even after Najib went to jail, his lawyer Muhammad Shafee Abdullah continued to sing the same song - the source of RM42 million that entered into his client's bank account was actually a donation from Saudi royals.
Speaking during Umno’s special briefing in Kuala Lumpur on Aug 27, he said: “It is not because he loves Najib, but he really liked how Najib had taken care (sic) of Malaysia.
“Malaysia is seen as one of the countries that do not enforce extreme Islamic values so they (Saudi) wanted to give assistance personally so that Najib could return as the prime minister again during the next elections.”
Why yet another walk in the past? Let me declare, that this issue has to be in the public domain to understand the massive disinformation campaign which began to roll after the 1MDB scandal made the headlines.
When one is already in the slammer and while others wait for their turn, disinformation campaigns will continue with familiar catchphrases like “selective persecution” and “fair trial”.
The lies and half-truths will be conveniently omitted for political expediency and to create a new sloganeering.
These lines will continue to be heard as we approach the general election and discerning Malaysians will definitely know how to separate the wheat from the chaff. - Mkini
R NADESWARAN is a veteran journalist who writes on bread-and-butter issues. Comments: [email protected].
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.

---