Race Religion And The Future Of Malaysia

---

 
MALAYSIA, recognised for its vibrant cultural diversity, faces considerable political, economic, and social challenges.
The nation is home to a multifaceted population, predominantly consisting of Malays, Chinese, Indians, and various indigenous groups, which has contributed to its unique identity.
Nevertheless, the growing prominence of race and religion in the political arena has sparked apprehensions regarding the future stability and cohesion of the country.
The historical context of race and religion in Malaysia
Since gaining independence in 1957, Malaysia’s political and social framework has been significantly influenced by the factors of race and religion.
The establishment of the nation was based on a social contract intended to reconcile the interests of its diverse ethnic groups.
The political landscape was solidified by the Alliance coalition, which later evolved into Barisan Nasional, comprising parties that were organised along racial lines.
Notably, UMNO represented the Malay-Muslim majority, MCA served the Chinese community, and MIC catered to the Indian population.
Although this strategy was initially perceived as a means to mitigate ethnic conflicts, the growing focus on race and religious based policies has exacerbated societal divisions.
These policies, originally intended to foster unity and equality, have increasingly transformed into instruments of political advantage, thereby entrenching a cycle of identity politics.
Fostering division among communities
(Image: The Edge)One of the most detrimental consequences of advocating for race and religion is its capacity to create divisions among Malaysia’s multilayered communities.
The strategic employment of ethnic and religious identities for political gain has contributed to an environment of polarisation, wherein individuals are increasingly viewed through the prism of their race or religion rather than as unified citizens of a nation.
As political discussions become more centred on religious identity, Malaysians find themselves increasingly divided into “us” versus “them”, a dichotomy that worsens ethnic and religious tensions.
This brand of identity politics erodes social cohesion and diminishes Malaysia’s capacity to cultivate an inclusive national identity.
The emphasis on racial and religious distinctions diverts attention from the common interests and challenges that all Malaysians encounter collectively, such as economic progress, social equity, and national security.
Economic and social consequences
Race and religion-oriented advocacy in Malaysia poses significant challenges to the nation’s economic development by fostering a culture of favouritism and entitlement that undermines the principles of meritocracy.
When policies favour specific racial or religious groups, they often lead to inefficiencies and misallocation of resources, thereby impeding competition and innovation.
Moreover, these race-centric policies have incited feelings of resentment among non-Malay communities, especially among the Chinese and Indian populations, who perceive themselves as marginalised from economic opportunities.
This division hampers the collective potential of the nation’s human capital.
Rather than cultivating an atmosphere of innovation, entrepreneurship, and diligence, Malaysia finds itself in a situation where racial groups harbour suspicion and mistrust towards one another, ultimately obstructing the country’s capacity to succeed in a competitive, globalised economy.
Weakening national identity
At the heart of Malaysia’s identity dilemma is the tension between multiculturalism and the promotion of racial and religious interests.
The prevailing narrative has positioned Malaysia as a multicultural society, where diverse ethnic and religious communities coexist harmoniously and contribute to the nation’s overall well-being.
However, when political advocacy is rooted in race and religion, it risks fragmenting this narrative into rival tribal identities.
An effective national identity ought to transcend racial and religious boundaries, emphasising shared values, collective aspirations, and joint progress.
(Image: The Star)Nevertheless, as political figures continue to manipulate these divisions, the opportunity for Malaysia to coalesce around a unified identity diminishes.
This is particularly apparent in the increasing prominence of Malay nationalism, where political discourse frequently highlights the necessity of safeguarding Malay privileges and Islamic principles, occasionally at the expense of national cohesion.
The persistent promotion of ethnicity-based policies and religious narratives often leads individuals in Malaysia to identify primarily with their specific groups rather than as citizens of a unified nation.
This emphasis on preserving advantages for one community over another undermines the pursuit of a cohesive Malaysian identity founded on principles of equality, mutual respect, and shared objectives.
Conclusion
The advocacy centred on race and religion in Malaysia presents considerable threats to the nation’s social, economic, and political equilibrium.
The persistent utilisation of ethnic and religious identities as instruments of political manoeuvring risks intensifying societal divisions, hindering economic advancement, undermining national solidity, and promoting political unrest.
To ensure a thriving and harmonious future, it is essential for Malaysia to transcend the limitations imposed by identity politics and adopt a framework grounded in meritocracy, unity, and common values.
Such initiatives are vital for Malaysia to cultivate a unified society that exemplifies diversity and progress on a global scale.
R. Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd (ARRESCON), a think tank specialising on strategic national and geo-political matters.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of  MMKtT.
- Focus Malaysia.

---