Character Is The Final Judge Of Malaysians Irrespective Of Race Or Religion

---

 
IN early March 2025, a controversy emerged in Malaysia involving three DJs from Era FM’s 3 Pagi Era show. A video which made its rounds on social media showed how one of the DJs had mimicked the sacred kavadi ritual, chanting “Vel Vel”, a phrase deeply significant in Hinduism, while the others laughed.
This act was perceived as mocking the Thaipusam festival, leading to widespread criticism from the Hindu community.
In response to the backlash, Era FM promptly removed the video, and the three DJs issued a public apology, acknowledging their insensitivity and expressing deep regret for offending the Indian community. They were subsequently suspended pending an internal review.
National Unity Minister Datuk Aaron Ago Dagang also condemned the act, stating that mocking any religion is unacceptable and contradicts the principles of the Rukun Negara, Malaysia’s national philosophy.
Meanwhile, Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil instructed the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to conduct a detailed investigation.
Additionally, the police initiated a probe under Section 298 of the Penal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 after receiving multiple reports alleging that the video wounded religious feelings.
At the end of the day, character determines whether one chooses to mock others or treat them with respect. A person of good character exercises empathy, understanding, and self-restraint, recognising that certain cultural and religious expressions hold deep significance for others.
Mocking often arises from ignorance, arrogance, or insensitivity, while respect comes from wisdom, humility, and moral integrity. This applies universally, whether in personal interactions, public discourse, or media representation.
In cases like the “Vel Vel” incident, the behaviour of those involved ultimately reflects their character. Were they acting out of malice, carelessness, or genuine ignorance? How they respond—whether with sincere remorse or defensiveness—also reveals their character.
The idea that “character is the final judge” is a universal principle found across many religions and philosophical traditions.
It emphasises that a person’s true worth is ultimately determined by their actions, integrity, and moral conduct rather than their background, status, or beliefs. Here’s how different religions and faiths reflect this idea:
In Islam the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) said, “The best among you are those who have the best character.” (Sahih Bukhari)
In Christianity it is stated that “By their fruits, you will recognise them.” (Matthew 7:16), meaning a person’s actions define them.
In Hinduism the Bhagavad Gita (16:1-3) lists qualities of a virtuous person, such as truthfulness and self-control, as the highest markers of righteousness.
In Buddhism it is stated in the Dhammapada that “A man is not noble because of lineage; he is noble only if he possesses virtue and wisdom.”
Sikhism Guru Nanak taught that true devotion is shown through honest living and good deeds.
Confucianism states “The superior man is modest in his speech but exceeds in his actions.” (Analects 14:29)
In the Bahai Faith it is stated that “Man’s merit lieth in service and virtue and not in the pageantry of wealth and riches.”
This aligns with the idea that character—reflected in one’s actions and integrity—is the final judge, not wealth, social status, or outward expressions of faith.
Suggested solutions to the current debacle
While official actions like suspensions, apologies, and investigations can address specific incidents, they don’t necessarily change individual attitudes. Some people may still mock others out of ignorance, bias, or even deliberate provocation.
To truly prevent such behaviour, there needs to be following actions and approaches.
Schools and media should promote cultural literacy so people understand the significance of religious practices and symbols creating higher and better awareness and education.
There must be consistence by authorities and society which must hold individuals accountable when they cross the line, ensuring that respect isn’t just encouraged but expected.
The influential figures (media personalities, politicians, educators) should set the tone by promoting respect and inclusivity by leading by examples.
There must be more interfaith and intercultural dialogues can help bridge gaps and reduce misunderstandings through community engagement.
Mockery may never fully disappear, but a society that strongly values character and respect can make it less acceptable and less frequent. The thoughts and action lies in the institution, community and individuals. 
K.Tamil Maran ( KT Maran)
Seremban, Negri Sembilan
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of MMKtT. 
- Focus Malaysia.

---