Aug 8 Set To Hear Kepong Mp S Bid To Stay Rm2m Defamation Award

---

The Court of Appeal has fixed Aug 8 to hear Kepong MP Lim Lip Eng’s application to stay a lower court ruling for him to pay RM2 million damages in a defamation suit.
The DAP lawmaker seeks the stay pending disposal of his main appeal against the Kuala Lumpur High Court decision that found he had defamed e-commerce firm, Monspace (M) Sdn Bhd and its founder Jessy Lai.
Lim’s (above) counsel Sankara Nair confirmed with the media about the hearing date set during case management of the appeal before the Court of Appeal earlier today.
Sankara said that during case management before deputy registrar Mariam Hasanah Othman, the appellate court took notice that all cause papers for the stay application has been filed.
The lawyer added that the Court of Appeal stay hearing would be conducted online, via Zoom.
Counsel Wong Guo Jin, who is from the same law firm as Sankara namely SN Nair & Partners, represented Lim during the case management.
Sankara NairLawyer Siew Yen Mee appeared for Monspace and Lai.
On March 16, the High Court ruled that Lim had defamed MonSpace and Lai, and ordered the lawmaker to pay RM2 million in damages.
Judge Akhtar Tahir had also ordered the defendant to pay RM250,000 in costs and make a public apology.
In his full grounds of judgment, the judge said the RM2 million compensation award against Lim is meant to discourage uncalled-for and unverified statements in the current social media age.
Akhtar said the defendant must be more responsible in his speech and actions, and that Lim as a parliamentarian cannot be “trigger-happy shooting from the hip”.
While it might not have killed any person physically, it has certainly “killed” the two plaintiffs’ reputations.
“The court also feels that in this case, the damages awarded must act as a deterrence.
“This is not to stifle freedom of speech and expression but as a discouragement for any person making uncalled-for and unverified statements, especially in the era of the wide use of social media.
“Another reason why deterrence is required is the fact that the courts are inundated with cases involving defamation involving all strata of the society - from the highest to the lowest,” Akhtar said.
The judge added that the phrase “see you in court” seems to have become a fashion statement rather than being something to be fearful about.
‘MP didn’t show remorse, combative’
“A final factor which took into account, in this case, is that the defendant did not show any remorse for his actions and on the converse, was combative in his attitude.
“The plaintiffs had graciously agreed to settle the matter without going for the full trial with a mere apology, but the defendant refused this request,” Akhtar said.
The judge added that Lim’s statement contained various serious allegations, such as the giving of kickbacks and protection money to government officials, and involvement in illegal activities that led to several Chinese nationals suffering financial losses.
On May 22, the High Court denied Lim’s application to stay its verdict pending disposal of his appeal before the Court of Appeal.
The lawmaker then had gone up to the appellate court to seek the stay order.
It was previously reported that Lim succeeded in his crowdfunding effort to raise RM2.25 million (RM2 million defamation award plus RM250,000 in costs) for the case.
Back in 2019, the media reported that Monspace and its founder filed a civil action against Lim over an allegation that the company was involved in an investment scheme that failed to pay returns as promised to investors.
The lawsuit came on the heels of multiple statements allegedly made by Lim, including when he and several Chinese nationals visited the company headquarters in Bukit Jalil back on May 23, 2017.
According to the lawsuit’s statement of claim, the two plaintiffs were seeking general and aggravated damages for over 15 alleged defamatory remarks made by Lim through five publications between 2017 and 2018.
Lim, incumbent Sungai Pelek assemblyperson Ronnie Liu and 19 Chinese nationals - who claimed they were victims of the MonSpace investment scheme - had gone to the headquarters of the multinational firm to demand a refund or at least an explanation as to why their investment had purportedly not materialised. - Mkini

---