Was The Speaker S Decision Constitutional


 


Six MPs who stood in the last general election under the Bersatu’s logo switched their support to the prime minister after having been elected by the voters in their respective parliamentary constituencies.
Yes, they decided to back Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim in defiance of the party’s stance as the opposition. It was not clear what they had in mind when they decided to switch loyalty.
The six MPs are Syed Abu Hussin Hafiz Syed Abdul Fasal (Bukit Gantang), Zahari Kechik (Jeli), Mohd Azizi Abu Naim (Gua Musang), Iskandar Dzulkarnain Abdul Khalid (Kuala Kangsar), Suhaili Abdul Rahman (Labuan), and Zulkafperi Hanapi (Tanjong Karang).
In the meantime, Bersatu had amended its constitution to prevent its members from switching sides. The said amendment was duly approved by the Registrar of Societies (ROS) and came into effect on April 1, 2024.
ADSBefore the amendment to its constitution, the party passed a motion for the changes to prevent more MPs from switching allegiance and declaring support for other parties.
In justifying the aforesaid amendment, Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin reiterated that the amendment of Clause 10 of the party constitution was aimed at streamlining it with the anti-hopping provision under Article 49A of the Federal Constitution.
The Bersatu chief was referring to the anti-party hopping legislation that was introduced into the Federal Constitution via a bill passed by the Dewan Rakyat on July 28, 2023.
By virtue of Bersatu’s constitutional amendment, all six lawmakers who pledged support for Anwar’s administration have to immediately vacate their seats should they continue supporting the coalition government after the amendment was passed.
ADSStubborn defiance
But it did not happen that way. All the said MPs, however, stuck to their guns and refused to bow down to their party’s directives.
Needless to say, Bersatu treated their utter defiance of the party’s instructions with contempt. As far as Bersatu is concerned, the recalcitrant attitude of the six MPs was mind-boggling.
The party’s chief whip Ronald Kiandee then submitted a seat vacancy notification against the six MPs under Article 49A of the Federal Constitution to the Dewan Rakyat speaker Johari Abdul.
The said six MPs then submitted a letter of explanation to Johari on June 27, 2023, in response to Bersatu’s demand to vacate their seats.
According to Bukit Gantang MP Syed Hussin, their letter was sent to the speaker in order to facilitate Johari’s consideration before making any decision.
In their letter, the six MPs also questioned the legitimacy of their expulsion from Bersatu, which was carried out by the party’s supreme leadership council.
They, inter alia, argued that the expulsion failed to comply with Article 49A(1) of the Federal Constitution, which in their view clearly states that the right to vacate a seat is subject to a declaration made by the MPs (to leave their parties) themselves.
ADSYesterday, the speaker held that the six MPs do not have to vacate their seats. In essence, Johari disagreed with Bersatu’s declaration all six seats ought to be vacated as the six MPs were deemed to have been expelled by their party.
In other words, the speaker refused to declare the casual vacancy of the six parliamentary seats concerned.
Does the speaker have the power?
Legally speaking , this issue essentially boils down to the power of the Dewan Rakyat speaker under Article 49A(3) of the Federal Constitution, which stipulates: “Whenever the speaker receives a written notice from any member of the House of Representatives on the occurrence of a casual vacancy among the members of the House of Representatives under this Article, the speaker shall establish that there is such a casual vacancy and notify the Election Commission accordingly within 21 days from the date he received the written notice.”
Some lawyers argue that the speaker has no power not to declare the casual vacancy of the six seats upon receiving the seat vacancy notification from Bersatu.
In other words, the speaker has no business at all to go beyond the four corners of the seat vacancy notification which he duly received.
The speaker’s constitutional function under Article 49A(3) of the Federal Constitution is merely to carry out the wish and intent of Bersatu. Period.
The speaker has no power to substitute or replace Bersatu’s decision under the guise of exercising a power of interpretation. After all, under the Societies Act, the decision of any political party is final and it shall not be questioned by any court of law, let alone the speaker.
It so happens the existing speaker has no legal background but he is considered as a seasoned MP.
To be fair, I must say there is no constitutional requirement for a speaker to possess any legal background.
One may therefore argue that since many of our past speakers had solid legal backgrounds, such a requirement may be tantamount to only be part of constitutional conventions.
Dewan Rakyat speaker Johari AbdulAnyway, there is a second opinion which views the right and duty to determine whether a casual vacancy has arisen in the Dewan Rakyat rests solely on its speaker, and only the speaker’s decision matters.
This view also argues that a political party’s role is limited to notifying the speaker that a member has resigned or ceased to be its member. Period.
Disregarding anti-hopping law’s intention
Being one of the members of the special committee that drafted the said constitutional provision, with the greatest respect, I tend to agree with the first interpretation which in my view truly reflects the parliamentary intention when we - the committee members - drafted the law.
In my view, the committee had no intention of conferring very wide powers for the speaker, so much so they may go beyond the parameters of the letter of notification they received from any political party which finally decides the faith or status of its MPs.
By making a decision that is clearly contrary to the decision made by any political party, I submit the speaker has unconstitutionally exceeded his power and such a decision may be infected by elements of illegality and irrationality.
Anyway, there is a strong likelihood that this issue may land in a court of law. Let us wait and see. - Mkini
MOHAMED HANIPA MAIDIN is a former deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.


Artikel ini hanyalah simpanan cache dari url asal penulis yang berkebarangkalian sudah terlalu lama atau sudah dibuang :

http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.com/2024/07/was-speakers-decision-constitutional.html

Kempen Promosi dan Iklan
Kami memerlukan jasa baik anda untuk menyokong kempen pengiklanan dalam website kami. Serba sedikit anda telah membantu kami untuk mengekalkan servis percuma aggregating ini kepada semua.

Anda juga boleh memberikan sumbangan anda kepada kami dengan menghubungi kami di sini
Speaker S Bersatu 6 Decision A Double Edged Sword Says Analyst

Speaker S Bersatu 6 Decision A Double Edged Sword Says Analyst

papar berkaitan - pada 14/7/2024 - jumlah : 97 hits
Partisan actions by a parliamentary speaker could diminish confidence in the speaker s impartiality and in the government s credibility The Dewan Rakyat speaker s decision not to vacate the seats of six MPs formerly with Bersatu could stren...
Wrong To Make Speaker The Punching Bag In Bersatu 6 Controversy Akmal Told

Wrong To Make Speaker The Punching Bag In Bersatu 6 Controversy Akmal Told

papar berkaitan - pada 18/7/2024 - jumlah : 140 hits
PKR Youth communications director Haziq Azfar said Umno Youth chief Dr Akmal Saleh has yet to condemn Bersatu for the controversy surrounding the six MPs who declared support for the government PETALING JAYA A PKR Youth leader has taken Umn...
Speaker S Decision Not In Spirit Of Anti Party Hopping Law Says Group

Speaker S Decision Not In Spirit Of Anti Party Hopping Law Says Group

papar berkaitan - pada 11/7/2024 - jumlah : 232 hits
Tindak Malaysia warns of long term consequences of allowing the Bersatu 6 to keep their seats after they were fired from their party THE Dewan Rakyat speaker s decision to allow six former Bersatu MPs to keep their seats after they were fir...
Pn To Don Armbands In Dewan To Protest Speaker S Decision

Pn To Don Armbands In Dewan To Protest Speaker S Decision

papar berkaitan - pada 12/7/2024 - jumlah : 138 hits
Perikatan Nasional chief whip Takiyuddin Hassan said they want to express their disappointment and dissatisfaction with Dewan Rakyat Speaker Johari Abdul s decision on the six seats KUALA LUMPUR All opposition MPs will wear white armbands i...
Bersatu Six Decision And The Backsliding Of Reforms

Bersatu Six Decision And The Backsliding Of Reforms

papar berkaitan - pada 13/7/2024 - jumlah : 85 hits
First there was not applying fair allocation to all constituencies Now there is the anti hopping law as six formerly Bersatu men are allowed to keep their seats technically as opposition even though they changed political allegiances and we...
Direct Your Wrath Towards Bersatu Not The Speaker Akmal Told Over Bersatu 6 Controversy

Direct Your Wrath Towards Bersatu Not The Speaker Akmal Told Over Bersatu 6 Controversy

papar berkaitan - pada 18/7/2024 - jumlah : 149 hits
The speaker s decision is based on provisions of Article 49A of the Federal Constitution which only allows for a seat to be vacated when an elected representative leaves his her voluntarily and not when he she is let go for violating party ...
Speaker S Decision On Turncoat Reps Can Backfire On Govt Shahrir Says

Speaker S Decision On Turncoat Reps Can Backfire On Govt Shahrir Says

papar berkaitan - pada 11/7/2024 - jumlah : 109 hits
Umno veteran Shahrir Samad has warned that Dewan Rakyat speaker Johari Abdul s decision to allow six Bersatu turncoat representatives to keep their seats could backfire on the government Taking to Shahrir took a swipe at what he described a...
The Double Edged Sword Decision Of Allowing 6 Bersatu Traitors To Retain Their Seats

The Double Edged Sword Decision Of Allowing 6 Bersatu Traitors To Retain Their Seats

papar berkaitan - pada 11/7/2024 - jumlah : 143 hits
FORMER de facto law minister Datuk Zaid Ibrahim has described Dewan Rakyat speaker Tan Sri Johari Abdul as being incapable of behaving properly and totally unfit to discharge his duties fairly and effectively by ruling that the six Bersatu ...
Play Free Online Casino Games Online Ideal Slot Scratch Cards 2024

20 Free Of Charge Spins With No Down Payment At Ozwin Casino

Tular Mesej Dakwa Tabung Kilat Dibuka Untuk Siti Mastura Benarkah

A Poem By Zurinah Hassan With Translation

Mp Pas Ini Disaran Jangan Jadi Seperti Pesuruhjaya Pas Perak Yang Boleh Dianggap Sebagai Pemfitnah Bersiri

Spm 2024 Timetable

Timnas Indonesia Lolos Kualifikasi Piala Dunia Fifa 2026 Faktor Pendukung Dan Strategi Pelatih

Malaysia Punyai Potensi Perdagangan Halal Lebih Usd 1 Trilion Anwar


echo '';
Senarai Lagu Tugasan Konsert Minggu 4 Gegar Vaganza 2024 Musim 11

Keputusan Markah Peserta Konsert Minggu 3 Gegar Vaganza 2024 Musim 11

FFM 2024 Senarai Keputusan Pemenang Calon Top 5 Kategori Hadiah Persembahan Penyampai Trofi Dan Segala Info Festival Filem Malaysia 33

Info Dan Sinopsis Drama Berepisod Marina 2024 Di Aplikasi Tonton

Info Dan Sinopsis Drama Berepisod Berbahagi Suami Slot Tiara Astro Prima Adaptasi Siri Indonesia Berbagi Suami The Series


Allah Maha Mendengar

From Screen To Imagination The Benefits Of Reading E Books For Creativity

Al Safa Iskandar Puteri Getaway

Bufet Makan Malam Sempena Perayaan Krismas Di Renaissance Johor Bahru Hotel

Adakah Predisolone Sesuai Untuk Kanak Kanak

Langkah Bijak Mengurangi Tagihan Energi Bulanan