How Did Bersatu Secure Rm255 Mil In Donations At The Height Of The Pandemic

---

Who were the donors and sponsors? Were they not hit by the pandemic? If they were businessmen, were their companies insulated from the pandemic and they did not lay off workers, cut their salaries or scaled down operations? Were they recipients of the Bersatu-led Government’s largesse?
Edwyn Soo
Following the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) decision to freeze the accounts of Bersatu recently, the party made public its audited accounts for 2020 and 2021. The period coincided with the duration its party president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin was Prime Minister i.e. from March 2020 to Aug 2021
Presumably, Bersatu’s move was to portray the party as being above board as it was unafraid to disclose where its sources of incomes were from and how they were spent. It also jives with Bersatu’s narrative that the unity government was using the MACC as a tool for political intimidation
But a closer inspection of the accounts published here has raised worrying questions. In 2020, the party received RM108,164,679 in “sponsorships and donations”. The following year, the amount went up by about 36% to RM147,647,329
As we know, 2020 and 2021 were when Covid-19 was at its peak. Many Malaysians succumbed to the disease and businesses were hard hit, with many folding. It was a dire time, not just in terms of public health, but also economically. It wouldn’t be a stretch to say that it was the worst crisis the country had ever faced
But for a ruling political party to receive such a substantial amount in its official accounts during the period certainly raised eyebrows (no records are available on whether unofficially, the party and its leaders received any more donations)
Until Bersatu makes public the identity of the donors and whether or not there was any quid pro quo arrangements, the public has the right to be skeptical
Who were the donors and sponsors? Were they not hit by the pandemic? If they were businessmen, were their companies insulated from the pandemic and they did not lay off workers, cut their salaries or scaled down operations? Were they recipients of the Bersatu-led Government’s largesse
As we know, there is no such thing as a free lunch, much less a “feast” when many Malaysians were literally going to bed hungry during that period. Some had resorted to literally flying the white flag to raise awareness about their plights. Many had lost their jobs or saw their incomes slashed and making ends meet became a luxury
While the Government had provided some relief in the form of direct cash aid or food baskets for the B40, a substantial amount still came from taxpayers themselves such as allowing EPF contributors to withdraw their own savings or reduction in Socso contribution by employees
Bersatu leaders may think that they were being bold by publishing its audited accounts. Far from it, the move only cast more aspersions on the party. This is especially so in light of claims by the Prime Minister and Finance Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that there were lapses in government expenditure amounting to RM92.5 billion during the Muhyiddin administration
It didn’t help that the cousin of Muhyiddin’s son-in-law had recently been detained by the MACC over government procurement exercises relating to the various economic stimulus packages between 2020 and 2021
Bersatu has a lot to answer for. It should worry about its own backyard and come clean over its finances before it starts thinking about wrestling back Putrajaya, whether through electoral, but more likely, given its track record, backdoor means

---