Lynas Are We Prostituting Our Environment And Health



Nathaniel Tan, The Star
THE Lynas controversy can probably be summarised into a simple question: Is it worth having Lynas here in Malaysia?
The bulk of the answer to this question can likely be determined by doing a simple cost benefit analysis.
In extremely broad strokes: the benefit is a lot of money; the cost is danger to the environment and the health of Malaysians.
Any policy regarding Lynas should be based on hard, independently verifiable science.
The problem is, in our current era, objective, scientific facts tend to get drowned in a sea of noisy polemic, or covered up and discredited by interested parties.
Either that, or objective, scientific studies are never even commissioned – which may well be the case in this issue.
Indeed, Lynas’ lack of emphasis on hard, independently verified science (which would help its case immensely) may be the most damning indication that the science does not in fact support its position.
If, for instance, Lynas was spending more of its resources cosying up to politicians in backroom deals than in consistently publicising good, verifiable science, then we should all be concerned.
I think there is no question that the radioactive waste produced by Lynas is harmful and bad for the environment. The only question is exactly how harmful and bad.
One of the simplest and most powerful proofs of this is that Australia – where Lynas mines the rare earth before shipping it to Malaysia – has stated that it absolutely refuses to allow the radioactive waste produced by Lynas in Malaysia to be shipped back to Australia (this was solution originally proposed by Energy, Science, Technology, Environment and Climate Change Minister Yeo Bee Yin).
I think this refusal tells the rest of us a great deal about exactly how dangerous the radioactive waste produced by Lynas is.
Lynas seems to consistently insist that the waste produced by its plant is not harmful. If it is not harmful, why won’t Australia agree to take it back?
Is it a question of economic viability? You have a ship coming over full of raw minerals – why not simply load the same ship with the radioactive waste on the way back?
One of the reasons given is that Australia has an established Green Party – a political party that campaigns primarily on environmental issues. Thus, any decision to bring radioactive waste back to Australia would be seen as very unpopular (for good reason) and thus politically costly.
So, is it thus okay to dump the waste here in Malaysia simply because we don’t have a Green Party? (Perhaps a Malaysian Green Party is something we should be looking into, incidentally.)
Long story short: nobody wants radioactive waste to be put in their backyard.
So, what do you do with waste that nobody wants?
Simple: you find someone who needs money badly enough, and you pay them to take whatever it is most people don’t seem to want to take.
Congratulations Malaysia, we have now achieved the status of environmental prostitutes.
(I should be clear that this is no way a judgement on the oldest profession. Indeed, when done voluntarily without compulsion, it is often a more honest, straightforward form of work than politics. The point is that if you are selling something precious for a price, you should be upfront about it.)
Especially during his first stint as Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad developed a sterling reputation as being one of the most outspoken leaders of the Third World. Time and again, there were no holds barred as he ripped apart former colonial powers and what he saw as neo-colonial policies.
But what of today? Where is his bravery in withstanding environmental colonialism – perpetrated by the same former colonial powers?
We can only hope that our Prime Minister is not a climate change denier like US President Donald Trump.
When it came to light that developed countries were sending endless amounts of plastic waste to Malaysia, making us basically a dumping ground for the rest of the world and giving rise to illegal plastic recycling that was (ironically) extremely harmful to the environment, there was a huge outcry – and rightly so.
What kind of nation would we be, if we happily told the world that for a price, they were welcome to treat us as a giant trash bag?
Everyone agreed that we should not devalue and sell out our environment that way. And now not just Malaysia, but other developing countries are starting to say a hard “no” to importing waste of any sort. Good on us.
How is Lynas any different though?
Everybody wants to make money, but nobody wants to deal with the radioactive waste.
Does that mean that the people with money thus get to decide who among the people without money have to deal with life threatening radioactive waste?
We’re not just talking Australians versus Malaysians here – we’re talking rich, powerful Malaysians versus poor, everyday Malaysians.
This isn’t the first time that Malaysia – or indeed Dr Mahathir himself – has had to deal with a radioactive rare earth problem.
The Asia Rare Earth Sdn Bhd (ARE, a company owned by Mitsubishi Chemicals) incident in Bukit Merah, Perak during the 1980s which involved rare earth and radioactive waste is surprisingly rarely mentioned.
Cilisos did a good summary of this case, which is said to have caused eight cases of leukemia and seven deaths. About 20 years after the cleanup of this radioactive mess began, over RM300mil has been spent cleaning up this waste, and the work is still not done!
Back when the ARE factory was in operation, when one worker, Lai Kwan, was pregnant, she was told by her boss to take unpaid leave whenever dangerous materials were being delivered to the factory.
Her son from that pregnancy, Cheah Kok Leong, was eventually born with cataracts and atrial septal defect (ASD), and as predicted by doctors, did not live past 30. Kok Leong died less than a decade ago, in 2010.
His mother said he enjoyed watching the new moon each month, and that every time she now sees the new moon, she would think of him.
Had he been born without these defects, Kok Leong would have been about my age today.
In the Cilisos article above, there is a picture of Kok Leong, along with a Dr Jayabalan – presumably the same Dr Jayabalan A. Thambyappa quoted in a 2011 New York Times article as essentially saying the radioactive waste produced by Lynas was still a carcinogen, whether or not they were deemed to be “low level” or not.
There is always space for objectivity. If independent, objective scientists (meaning scientists that do not have a reputation for propping up big businesses) can demonstrate conclusively that there are indeed safe ways to dispose of this radioactive waste, I think we can be open minded.
The study must however be extremely independent, thorough, and convincing from A to Z.
Even if such a safe method of disposal exists however, that still doesn’t explain why shipping the waste back to Australia – the country which profits the most (by far, presumably) from this endeavour – would not be a feasible option.
No doubt, rare earth minerals are of extremely high strategic value, especially amidst a US-China trade war.
Perhaps this is why Dr Mahathir has been quite defensive about Lynas. His argument has been that if we make it difficult for Lynas to operate as it likes, it will basically cost us a lot of money – opportunity cost, loss of investor confidence that will reduce future foreign direct investment, and so on.
With all due respect though, this is coming from a man in his mid-90s. Not to put too fine a point on it, the fact is that he will not be around to feel the full brunt of the climate crisis that is engulfing the entire globe.
Furthermore, the radioactive waste is not being put anywhere near where his children or grandchildren live or will ever live. If it were, would he make the same decision?
Nobody asked Lai Kwan before they dumped radioactive waste near where she and her son lived.
However many millions or billions we earn from Lynas, would it have bought Cheah Kok Leong the opportunity to watch even one more new moon?
 


Artikel ini hanyalah simpanan cache dari url asal penulis yang berkebarangkalian sudah terlalu lama atau sudah dibuang :

https://www.malaysia-today.net/2019/08/13/lynas-are-we-prostituting-our-environment-and-health/

Kempen Promosi dan Iklan
Kami memerlukan jasa baik anda untuk menyokong kempen pengiklanan dalam website kami. Serba sedikit anda telah membantu kami untuk mengekalkan servis percuma aggregating ini kepada semua.

Anda juga boleh memberikan sumbangan anda kepada kami dengan menghubungi kami di sini
Lynas Gov T Must Put Public Health Environment At Centre

Lynas Gov T Must Put Public Health Environment At Centre

papar berkaitan - pada 13/8/2019 - jumlah : 230 hits
Sahabat Alam Malaysia is extremely concerned by news reports that the government has decided to allow Lynas to continue operating its plant for at least another six months This is despite the fact that the company has not safely disposed of...
Lynas Malaysia Receives Gold Class Occupational Safety And Health Award

Lynas Malaysia Receives Gold Class Occupational Safety And Health Award

papar berkaitan - pada 14/8/2019 - jumlah : 255 hits
KUCHING Lynas Malaysia s continued commitment to the highest occupational safety and health standards has been recognised with a Gold class award from The Malaysian Society for Occupational Safety and Health After a stringent auditing proce...
Politicians Are Failing Our Education System

Politicians Are Failing Our Education System

papar berkaitan - pada 11/8/2019 - jumlah : 245 hits
Nation building starts with education A failed education system will lead to a failed nation Children come to school to do things and live in a shared community which would give them real guided experiences which would foster their capacity...
Lynas Not Off The Hook Yet

Lynas Not Off The Hook Yet

papar berkaitan - pada 3/8/2019 - jumlah : 333 hits
Putrajaya is expected to extend the current operation permit for Lynas Corp s rare earth refinery for a provisional period of six months According to sources this was decided by the cabinet on Wednesday The plant s current three year permit...
Anti Lynas Historical Revisionism A Response

Anti Lynas Historical Revisionism A Response

papar berkaitan - pada 2/8/2019 - jumlah : 192 hits
I refer to the letter It is shocking indeed to read the views of an ex project processing officer in Mida on the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant not because of any new revelations but how it was filled with misleading attempts at denigrating...
Putrajaya Confirms Letting Lynas Explore Rare Earths Waste Disposal In Malaysia

Putrajaya Confirms Letting Lynas Explore Rare Earths Waste Disposal In Malaysia

papar berkaitan - pada 2/8/2019 - jumlah : 189 hits
The Pakatan Harapan government has removed the requirement for Lynas Corp to repatriate its rare earth processing waste as a precondition for its licence renewal Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad confirmed today Instead the prime minister said the Au...
Lynas Represents Mother Of All Harapan U Turns

Lynas Represents Mother Of All Harapan U Turns

papar berkaitan - pada 3/8/2019 - jumlah : 253 hits
The recent U turn on Lynas represents the mother of all u turns for Pakatan Harapan Harapan s u turn on the Lynas issue is equivalent to cheating hundreds of thousands of people who voted Harapan into power Harapan rode on the wave of publi...
After Pair Rode On Anti Lynas Sentiment To Win Mca Wants By Elections

After Pair Rode On Anti Lynas Sentiment To Win Mca Wants By Elections

papar berkaitan - pada 3/8/2019 - jumlah : 363 hits
An MCA leader has demanded the resignations of two Pakatan Harapan lawmakers whom he claimed capitalised on the anti Lynas Corp sentiment to win in the last general election Vice president Ti Lian Ker said the voters should be allowed to de...
Datin Thalia Terkilan Dengan Sikap Buruk Pembantu Rumahnya

Kadir Jasin Warns Pmx Ph Against Falling Into The Trap To Free Najib

Pjd Link Cancellation Fahmi Tells Govt Critics To Read Pwd Statement

Either You Are For The Working Class Or Against It Anwar You Can T Both Run With The Foxes And Hunt With The Hounds

Effective Market Research On A Budget

Is Now A Good Time To Buy Property In 2024

Pengalaman Menginap Di Grand Court Hotel Teluk Intan Dekat Dengan Menara Condong Teluk Intan

Kerana Rasuah Rm100 Pekebun Kena Denda Rm10 000



8 Istilah Jerman Yang Kita Rakyat Malaysia Kerap Gunakan

Biodata Aizat Saha Pelakon Drama Berepisod Racun Rihanna TV3 Personaliti TikTok

Kenapa Platipus Haiwan Yang Membuatkan Saintis Merasa Hairan

Biodata Qistina Rania Pelakon Drama Berepisod Bercakap Dengan Jun Astro Ria Peserta Hero Dewi Remaja 2023

Biodata Dan Umur Adik Tantari Penyanyi Lagu Viral Rindu Hatiku Rindu Pesilat Cilik


Buasir Otak Tv Buang 4 Huruf Belakang Jadi Jenama Telefon Be Like

Kuala Kubu Baharu Of Fortress On Estuary And Lee S Legacy

Govt Opposition Should Agree On Redelineation Formula Says Bersatu Man

Too Soon To Tell Analyst Says On Mipp S Prospects In Pn

Menangkan Jackpot Di Game Jekpot88 Di Berbagai Permainan

Tukar Lesen Memandu Malaysia Ke Lesen Nsw Australia