Bank Pembangunan S Sham Litigation To Cover Zafer Bribe Perpatrators

---

Unmasking the BPMB Scandal: A Web of Conspiracy, Bribery, and Betrayal Targeting the Innocent
By Elena Vargas, Independent Corporate Investigative Journalists @ICIJnews
Corporate Secret  August 27, 2025 
In the shadowy corridors of Malaysia’s financial institutions, where billions in public funds are meant to fuel national development, a chilling conspiracy has unfolded – one that reeks of corruption, collusion, and a blatant disregard for justice. 
At the heart of this saga is Bank Pembangunan Malaysia Berhad (BPMB), a Malaysian Development Financial Institution mandated to provide medium to long-term financing to the country’s infrastructure, maritime, and oil C gas technology sectors, wholly owned by the Malaysian government through the Minister of Finance.
Instead, it appears to have become a vehicle for protecting the guilty while ensnaring the innocent in a RM564 million legal quagmire. 
Drawing from explosive court documents in the case of Paneagle Sdn Bhd v. Nik Nor Aini Nik Mohamed C Ors (Suit WA-23NCvC-72-08/2025 (“Suit 72″) or the “Suit to Set Aside Sham Consent Judgment”, this investigation reveals how BPMB, aided by its lawyer Dato’ Lim Chee Wee and key figures like Ranjeet Singh Sidhu (also known as Datuk Wira Ranjeet Singh Sidhu) and possibly influenced by high- profile connections such as the son of the founding chairman of BPMB, Tan Sri Syed Mohd Yusof Tun Syed Nasir and Ranjeet’s long time business partner and current BPMB director, Tan Sri Rashpal Singh Randhay, orchestrated a scheme to shield perpetrators of a massive loan fraud while targeting unrelated parties like Paneagle Sdn Bhd and 27 others!
This isn’t just a tale of financial mismanagement; it’s a provocative exposé of how powerful entities weaponise the courts to bury their sins. As an independent journalist who has spent years peeling back the layers of corporate malfeasance in Southeast Asia, I’ve seen my share of scandals – from phantom investments to rigged tenders – but the BPMB conspiracy stands out for its audacity. 
Here, a state-backed bank, sworn to uphold public trust, allegedly traded justice for fabricated affidavits, allowing RM75 million in misappropriated funds to vanish into the pockets of the connected few. The victims? 
Innocent companies like Paneagle, dragged into frivolous claims with no direct link to the original loan debacle.
Let’s rewind to 2012. BPMB disbursed a RM400 million loan to Aries Telecoms (M) Berhad for a fibre optic network project – a noble endeavour on paper. But within 48 hours of the first RM200 million tranche hitting Aries’ accounts, RM75 million flowed straight to companies linked to Ranjeet Singh Sidhu: RM50 million to GCP Solutions Sdn Bhd and RM25 million to Rothchilds Capital (I) Sdn Bhd. 
Court records from an earlier suit WA-22NCC-313-07/2018 (“Suit 313“) confirm BPMB knew about this as early as November 19, 2018. Yet, instead of clawing back the funds or alerting authorities, BPMB sat idle, allowing the statute of limitations to tick away.
Fast-forward to 2022, when BPMB launched Suit No. WA-22NCC-264-06/2022 (“Suit 264”), a RM564 million claim against 30 defendants, including Ranjeet, his associate Noorusa’adah Binti Othman (Sa’adah), and unrelated entities like Paneagle. 
The suit alleged a bribery scheme involving Dato’ Zafer, a BPMB officer, to facilitate the loan disbursements – the so-called “Zafer Bribe”. Ranjeet and Sa’adah provided self-incriminating affidavits admitting to arranging RM8 million and RM5.5 million bribes, respectively. 
But here’s the twist: these affidavits were allegedly procured through collusion, with BPMB rewarding them via consent judgments that let them off the hook for peanuts – RM500,000 for Ranjeet and RM2.5 million for Sa’adah – while parading a façade of recovery attempt against others.
Read on in Thick as a Brick here

---