Najib Deserves To Remain In Prison Desist From Steamrolling Pardons Process
Aliran has just released this statement:
Umno appears to be in a hurry to push for an early pardon for convict Najib Razak using as its basis the sole dissenting judgment against the guilty verdicts of 13 other judges at the High Court, the Court of Appeals and in two Federal Court panels.
We are concerned about what appears to be a concerted campaign of manipulation of the facts and disinformation about how the system of administration of justice works and the attempts to undermine the finality of the process at the Federal Court.
In the first place, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission should not have got involved in investigating High Court judge Nazlan Ghazali for alleged conflict of interest.
De facto law minister Azalina Othman Said must clear the air. Najib’s lawyers had asserted that in her 20 March reply to Najib’s lead counsel Shafee Abdullah, she had stated that “the answers to the questions (you have set out) are in the affirmative”.
Shafee had raised three questions in his 15 March letter, including whether Justice Nazlan had a conflict of interest.
But any investigation of the judge who had convicted Najib should have been left to the judiciary, which has its own procedure and Judges’ Code of Ethics.
On 24 February a seven-member Federal Court panel led by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat ruled that the MACC investigation of Justice Nazlan had disregarded judicial independence and protocols.
Support the struggle to build a Malaysia based on Justice, Freedom, Solidarity:
Sign up for Aliran’s free daily email updates or weekly newsletters or both
Make a one-off donation to Persatuan Aliran Kesedaran Negara, CIMB a/c 8004240948
Make a regular pledge or periodic auto-donation to Aliran
Become an Aliran member
Tel: 04-658 5251 email:
[email protected]
This clearly showed that that the MACC had overstepped its jurisdiction. It is ironic that the MACC thought it fit to get involved when its own chief, Azam Baki, remains mired in an unresolved controversy over the purchase of shares. This controversy severely tarnished the reputation of the MACC.
Umno should not short circuit the pardons process now by seeking an appointment with the Agong. The matter should be left to the Pardons Board and should take its usual course instead of being fast-tracked.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim should recuse himself from any involvement in the Pardons Board, as he himself could be in a position of conflict of interest.
Much wheeling and dealing took place behind closed doors after the general election last November. Many have suggested the possibility that Anwar may have been pressured to exert his influence in seeking a pardon for former Umno president Najib in return for Umno’s cooperation in his “unity government”. We hope this is not the case, but that is the perception out there among some quarters.
We note that public opinion is overwhelmingly against a pardon, with about 150,000 signing a petition opposing a pardon [sign the petition] with only 5% of that figure in favour, in a rival petition.
We urge all quarters to desist from exerting pressure for Najib’s early release, which will cause untold harm to Malaysia’s international image and investor confidence.
Remember, this is part of the world’s largest financial scandal. It severely tarnished the image of the nation and saddled the nation with enormous debt – money that could have been used to ease the suffering of millions of ordinary people.
A pardon for Najib would erode confidence in the judicial process, undermine the rule of law and make a mockery of the administration of justice in Malaysia.
Not only would it set a dangerous precedent, it would have grave implications on how the law is perceived.
READ MORE:Acclaim, anger and anxiety about Anwar’s accomplishments
It would give the impression that serious white-collar crime – which despite being rigorously processed by the Malaysian legal system, spanning years of trials and expending enormous national resources – can be easily pardoned, just because of the ‘exalted’ status of the criminal.
It would be a victory for attempts at manipulation and misinformation that have sought to undermine confidence in the judiciary.
It would also shatter the image of Anwar’s administration as a reformist government that has set its sights on enhancing good governance and repairing the immense damage done in the past.
May justice and good sense prevail.
Aliran executive committee
9 April 2023
Artikel ini hanyalah simpanan cache dari url asal penulis yang berkebarangkalian sudah terlalu lama atau sudah dibuang :
https://anilnetto.com/governance/accountability/najib-deserves-to-remain-in-prison-desist-from-steamrolling-pardons-process/