Malaysian Death Row Diplomacy Lacklustre Compared To Philippines Panel

---

 


Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) executive director Zaid Malek said the Malaysian government has been “lacklustre” when it comes to acting for its citizens on death row in other countries.
The human rights lawyer was speaking at the Cross-Border Defence for Persons on Death Row in the Asia Pacific panel organised by the Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network (Adpan), LFL, the Malaysian Centre for Constitutionalism and Human Rights (MCCHR), and Monash University.
On the other hand, United Kingdom lawyer Edward Fitzgerald, who was speaking at the same panel, praised the Philippines government for championing their citizens on death row abroad.
“I have certainly seen lots of evidence in Filipino cases. The strong advocacy from the Filipino government for their own citizens makes a massive difference and saves many lives.
“I think there was one occasion where they threatened to cut off economic ties if an execution went ahead,” he said.
Fitzgerald was possibly referring to then-Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte’s warning in 2018 that he might halt the migration of Filipino workers to the Middle East following reports of rape and suicide cases involving Filipinos there.
Former Philippines president Rodrigo DuterteThe event was held in conjunction with World Day Against the Death Penalty, which fell on Oct 10.
This comes after the execution of Malaysian death row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthanam in Singapore on Oct 8 for smuggling drugs into the republic.
Commenting further, Zaid condemned the Malaysian government, singling out Deputy Home Minister Shamsul Anuar Nasarah’s remark in the Dewan Rakyat on Oct 7 that Pannir’s information to police was “of no operational value”.
He called it “the last nail in Pannir’s coffin”.
Lawyers for Liberty executive director Zaid MalekZaid said the government’s response was also lacking in the case of Nagaenthran Dharmalingam, who was said to have an IQ of 69 - a level recognised as an intellectual disability.
‘These are not just legal cases’
ADSMeanwhile, Filipino lawyer Edre U Olalia highlighted the lessons activists can draw from the case of Mary Jane Veloso in building cross-border collaborations to defend individuals on death row.
Veloso, who was also his client, was saved from execution in Indonesia by global attention and sustained media coverage paired with a high level of civil society involvement, he said.
“The Philippines government’s political diplomatic efforts did not come from nowhere.
“It was precipitated and prompted by mass action, appeals, protests of people’s organisations, as well as the involvement of the church and endorsed groups over time,” he added.
A candlelight vigil for Nagaenthran Dharmalingam in April 2022He further stressed the importance of solidarity through collective action, saying that such cases are often not solely legal.
“It involves the intersection of poverty, gender, and forced migration,” he said.
In 2010, Veloso, a housemaid, was arrested after her arrival in Indonesia with 2.6kg of heroin.
In 2015, she was spared from execution by firing squad at the last minute following a request from the Filipino government.
In November 2024, Philippines’ President Ferdinand Marcos Jr announced that he had reached a deal for Veloso to return to her home country and serve a sentence there. - Mkini

---