Judges Are Appointed By Law Not Lobby
The appointment of judges to Malaysia’s superior courts is neither a subject for partisan debate nor should it be shaped by public sentiment or political interpretation.
It is a constitutional duty, carried out through a deliberate and structured process rooted in the Federal Constitution.
The recent appointment of Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as the chief justice of Malaysia, along with other senior judicial positions, has drawn public attention.
While differing views are expected in a democracy, such appointments must be examined through the lens of law, not political bias or speculation.
ADSArticle 122B of the Federal Constitution provides the legal framework for the appointment of judges to the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal, and the High Courts.
It states that such appointments shall be made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the prime minister and after consultation with the Conference of Rulers.
Ability matters more than personal history
In the case of Wan Farid, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim acted in full accordance with this constitutional obligation, which included consultation with the outgoing chief justice, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, as required under Article 122B(2).

Chief Justice Wan Ahmad Farid Wan SallehThe recommendation was then presented to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers.
These appointments were not only constitutional in form but institutional in substance, reflecting the checks and balances intended by the framers of the Constitution.
Concerns have been raised about the backgrounds or perceived affiliations of certain appointees.
However, prior involvement in political or administrative service does not, by itself, disqualify an individual from judicial office. What matters is the individual’s conduct on the bench, their integrity, professionalism, and ability to uphold the law impartially.
Judges are not appointed based on personal histories, but on their capacity to serve justice without fear or favour from the moment they take their oath.
The purpose of constitutional monarchy
Malaysia’s model of constitutional monarchy exists in part to ensure that key state functions, including judicial appointments, are insulated from immediate political pressure.
The involvement of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and the Conference of Rulers is central to this balance. It reinforces the principle that such appointments serve the national interest, not the interest of any one party or administration.

Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Ibrahim Sultan IskandarADSOur constitutional history also shows that the Conference of Rulers does not function merely as a rubber stamp. There have been cases where nominations were returned or reconsidered.
This reflects the active and thoughtful role the rulers play in protecting the integrity of national institutions.
Judges must now be free to operate
To question the legitimacy of these appointments, when they are made through constitutional procedure, is to question the very mechanism that guards judicial independence.
It risks eroding public confidence in one of the most vital arms of governance.
Once the process has been carried out in accordance with the Constitution, the discussion must return to principles, not personalities.
Judges will ultimately be assessed through the quality of their decisions, which is how any functioning democracy should evaluate its judiciary.

But before the courts are judged by outcomes, they must first be allowed to operate free from suspicion and political noise.
The right to scrutinise judicial rulings is an essential part of democracy, but that right must be grounded in an understanding of how our judicial system is constituted.
As these appointments take effect, we extend our full confidence and well wishes to the newly appointed leaders of the judiciary:
Wan Farid, chief justice of Malaysia
Abu Bakar Jais, president of the Court of Appeal
Azizah Nawawi, chief judge of the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak
May they uphold the rule of law with clarity, integrity, and unwavering commitment to justice for all Malaysians. - Mkini
MAHATHIR MOHD RAIS is a former Federal Territories Bersatu and Perikatan Nasional secretary.
The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of MMKtT.
Artikel ini hanyalah simpanan cache dari url asal penulis yang berkebarangkalian sudah terlalu lama atau sudah dibuang :
http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.com/2025/07/judges-are-appointed-by-law-not-lobby.html